|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 17 post(s) |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3902
   |
Posted - 2013.09.10 19:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
No.
This has to stop.
What this thread needs, is a GM who can express himself in a more detailed fashion !
Who's the community favourite ?
Thank you. |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3905
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 13:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
So this means that the "damsel in distress" could be banned,
but you won't touch her,
as she isn't doing anything wrong.
Yes? |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3905
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 14:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
This thread makes me want to reg an alt,
name it Solstice Project's Alt and move it to Hek.
Then I'll run around pretending to be me on the Alt,
while at the same time denying it on my main. |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3908
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 16:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
I'm So Meta, Even This Acronym got banned. |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3909
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 16:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
I just realised that i should be banned,
because i was impersonating the resident outlaw of Hek.
I didn't research if there already was somebody claiming that title. :( |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3920
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 18:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Georgina Parmala wrote:Heimdallofasgard wrote:HEY GUYS! I JUST IMPERSONATED MY ALT AND TRADED MY MAIN SAYING I WAS GOING TO TRANSPORT SOME LOOT TO JITA FOR MYSELF...
I MADE THE FOOLISH MISTAKE OF BELIEVING MYSELF AND NOW I HAVE ALL MY PHAT LOOT INSTEAD OF ME :'(
should I have used a courier contract? I'm pretty pissed off with myself for scamming me, I think myself should be banned but I don't believe I should be.
How do I legal? I like bashing this stupidity as much as the next guy, but lets have some common sense for a minute. The clarifying post clearly clarified that the person in im personation is defined as a character. A opposed to the player behind it, or an arbitrary entity such as an account. Lets say Solstice Project makes an alt. [ISMETA] wardecs a corporation. He approaches the corporation with the alt and says "I'm Solstice project's alt, give me 100 mil and I drop the dec". They pay up and contact Solstice about the transaction. He says no, that's not my alt you got scammed. What the nice GM is saying is that it does not matter that the alt is in fact the same player, or even on the same account as the main character. He falsely spoke on behalf of the main with malicious intent. So the alt gets a name change and a time out.
<3 :) |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3920
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 18:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
I want the CEO to speak up, please.
Everything else isn't actually appropriate anymore. |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3920
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 19:13:00 -
[8] - Quote
When do we reach the point when people start shooting the statue ? |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3920
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 19:14:00 -
[9] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Does anyone have a written example of CCP saying it was allright for a member of corp X to say he is a representant/member of corp Y and scam someone over joining corp corp Y? If not, then we can't say they endorsed it before. THis is where we lack most power. Most ruling if not all are case slosed for CCP and people are not allowed to discus them. I am quite sure that public interviews and publicly stating how awesome some of the scams in EvEs history were
definitely counts as endorsing them ...
Like Hilmar said, regarding the EvE Bank heist ... the first big one.
500 people left the game ... 5000 more joined in. |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3923
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 19:16:00 -
[10] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Can the current CSM members be banned for impersonating effective representatives? Wait, what ?
Aahhhh i get it !
Ban them for being representatives in the first place ! |
|
|
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3928
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 19:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
Ali Aras wrote:Vatek wrote:
Edit: by the way, as a CSM member you're supposed to be speaking on behalf of the interests OF THE PLAYERS, not acting as a mouthpiece supporting CCP's terrible decisions.
Ali Aras wrote:
With all that said, this thread has made clear that there remains some unhappiness with the policy as written and intended by CCP. This unhappiness has been noted by the CSM, and we can and will follow up on the policy itself. However, that process is a longer one that will take place internally; rioting in this thread is unlikely to be effective. Given the way the CSM process has worked so far and the success we've had in other conversations, I look forward to future productive discussions with CCP, and hope to be able to share results of those in the future.
The threadnaught is the best way for CCP and the game.
If people start pushing it into the game, (they can and will, if need arises!)
then **** get's real(ly bad).
Venting in a thread definitely is the best first step for all parties involved. |
|
|
| |
|